![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
â??The commons is the cultural and natural resources accessible to all members of a society,â?* quoth Wikipedia, â??held in common, not owned privately.â?* We live in an era of surveillance capitalism in a symbiotic relationship with advertising technology, quoth me. And I put it to you that Privacy is not just a virtue, or a value, or a commodity: it is a commons.
You may well wonder: isnâ??t Privacy pretty much definitionally â??owned privatelyâ?*? What does it matter to you, or to me, much less to society as a whole, if some 13-year-old somewhere (and her legal guardians) decide to sell her privacy to Facebook for $20 a month? OK, maybe you think rootcerting a teenager is sketchy â?? but if an adult chooses to sell their privacy, isnâ??t that entirely their own business? The answer is: no, actually, not necessarily; not if there are enough of them; not if the commodification of Privacy begins to affect us all. Privacy is like voting. An individualâ??s privacy, like an individualâ??s vote, is usually largely irrelevant to anyone but themselves â?¦ but the accumulation of individual Privacy or lack thereof, like the accumulation of individual votes, is enormously consequential. As Iâ??ve written before, â??This accumulation of data is, in and of itself, not a â??personal privacyâ?* issue, but a massive public security problem. At least three problems, in fact.â?* Those are:
Iâ??m not saying a single person selling rootcerted access to everything they do to Facebook for $20 a month is a major civic problem, or that itâ??s ethically wrong for them to do so. Selling their Privacy may be a perfectly reasonable and justifiable individual decision, in the same way that letting oneâ??s cow graze on Midsummer Common probably makes a lot of sense for both cow and owner. What I am saying is that selling Privacy cheaply isnâ??t any better for society than letting it be seized without any compensation. In fact, if Privacy commoditization leads to a more rapid degradation of the commons, itâ??s actually worse. Similarly, again, individual votes are essentially never that important â?¦ but would you think it OK for a company to purchase citizensâ?? voting rights for $20 per person per month? If we need to defend Privacy as a commons â?? and we do â?? then we canâ??t start thinking of it as an individual asset to be sold to surveillance capitalists. It, and we, are more important than that. </p> Source link More |
|
|