|
|
#1
07-15-2018, 08:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
The science behind Star Trek technobabble
/https%3A%2F%2Fblueprint-api-production.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Fcard%2Fimage%2F810746%2F478ae5ef-bf8b-453d-85f4-2cfe787fb78c.png)   This post is part of science of Sci-Fi, Mashable's ongoing series dissecting the science (or lack of science) in our favorite sci-fi movies, TV shows, and books. Star Wars is all action. You know, X-wings and lightsabers and fully armed and operational battle stations.* Star Trek — at least, the original series, The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, and Voyager — was less ... let's say, explosive. There were a lot of sensor readings. Also, sensible debates. Several episodes centered around academic conferences. SEE ALSO: Why Star Trek has never topped 'The Wrath of Khan' That's why I love it. The Star Trek franchise isn't about being handy with a laser pistol. It's about the power and promise of science, even if the actual science makes no sense. To that end, the writers perfected the art of technobabble — you know, dialogue that sounds scientific when uttered over a control panel but really doesn't mean much.* Read more... More about Science Fiction, Star Trek, The Science Of Sci Fi, Entertainment, and Science Fiction 
|
 |
|
|
العرض العادي
