|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
أدوات الموضوع | انواع عرض الموضوع |
|
#1
12-14-2014, 02:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
FDA: Reusuable Menstrual Pads to be Subject to $4000 a Year in Extortion Fees
 By Daisy Luther, The Organic PrepperWell, our good friends at the FDA are looking out for us again. Thank goodness we have them to fine us, charges us fees, regulate perfectly natural things, and keep us safe. Heck, who knew that women couldn?t even safely menstruate without them? The FDA has decided that reusable menstrual pads are Class I Medical Devices. That means those who manufacture these products must pay an annual fee of THREE TO FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS to continue doing so. **t only must these ladies armed with sewing machines pay taxes on their income, they must pay a fealty charge to the FDA to continue making a living this way. FDA Regulation #884.5435 states that a reusable Menstrual pad maker must be ?FDA compliant? ? which means they must pay a yearly registration fee of $3,646 to remain in business for 2015 and a fee of $3,872 for 2016. This is part of the Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act?also k**wn as ?The government gets a piece or they put you out of business.? As people strive for more independence from Big Business, this will serve to put them firmly in their places. Self-sufficiency creates a competitive model and provides options other than paying for the lavish vacations and 19 bedroom homes of the CEOs and major stockholders of corporations who find the Fees a **minal cost of doing business ? if they are even Subject to them at all. Go read the mindblowing list of things that will be exempted: included are the little lights that go on urethral catheters and esophagal dilators. These things don?t require oversight but a cloth pad does????????????? The FDA is terribly concerned for women, because reusable Pads are considered ?gynecological or obstetrical devices? that require their intervention. And fees. Don?t forget the fees. Women opt for natural reusable Menstrual products for a variety of reasons:
Class I means the class of devices that are Subject to only the general controls authorized by or under sections 501 (adulteration), 502 (misbranding), 510 (registration), 516 (banned devices), 518 (**tification and other remedies), 519 (records and reports), and 520 (general provisions) of the act. A device is in class I if (i) general controls are sufficient to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device, or (ii) there is insufficient information from which to determine that general controls are sufficient to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device or to establish special controls to provide such assurance, but the device is **t life-supporting or life-sustaining or for a use which is of substanial importance in preventing impairment of human health, and which does **t present a potential unreasonable risk of illness of injury. (source)  Are you freakin? kidding me? For that, people involved in cottage industries must pay thousands of dollars per year? Why are they trying to medicalize the regular shedding of uterine tissue, something that has been occurring since the beginning of time?If you want to talk about something that needs oversight, how about the feminine hygiene products you can purchase at the store? Do you have any idea what carci**genic materials those things contain? Here?s a quick primer on the contents of sanitary napkins: In August Women?s Voices for the Earth (WVE) commissioned STAT Analysis to analyze volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds in scented, unscented, and Infinity versions of ultra-thin Pads sold under the Always brand, which is manufactured by consumer-product giant Procter & Gamble (P&G). The results of the testing indicate that both scented and unscented Always Pads emit toxic chemicals, including chemicals identified by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services? National Toxicology Program, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, and the State of California Environmental Protection Agency, as carci**gens and reproductive and developmental toxins. The manufacturer discloses **ne of these chemicals on the product. Some chemicals of concern detected include styrene (a human carci**gen), chloromethane (a reproductive toxicant), chloroethane (a carci**gen), chloroform (a carci**gen, reproductive toxicant, and neurotoxin), and acetone (an irritant). These chemicals also have industrial uses such as in the manufacturing of car tires, nail-polish remover, and Styrofoam, as well as in petroleum refining. (source)This doesn?t even get into the vast amount of plastic in intimate contact with your body: Each conventional sanitary pad contains the equivalent of about four plastic bags! With everything we **w k**w about the hazardous nature of plastic chemicals, this alone is cause for concern. For example, plasticizing chemicals like BPA and BPS disrupt embryonic development and are linked to heart disease and cancer. Besides crude oil plastics, conventional sanitary Pads can also contain a myriad of other potentially hazardous ingredients, such as odor neutralizers and fragrances. Synthetics and plastic also restrict the free flow of air and can trap heat and dampness, potentially promoting the growth of yeast and bacteria in your vaginal area. (source)For women who use tampons instead of pads, the content of those is even more grim: Phthalates ? which give paper tampon applicators that smooth feel and finish ? are k**wn to dysregulate gene expression, and DEHP may lead to multiple organ damage. Furthermore, to give tampons and Pads that pristine, ?clean? white look, the fibers used must be bleached. Chlorine is commonly used for this, which can create toxic dioxin and other disinfection-by-products (DBPs) such as trihalomethane. Studies show that dioxin collects in your fatty tissues, and according to a draft report by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), dioxin a serious public health threat that has ** ?safe? level of exposure! Published reports show that even low or trace levels of dioxins may be linked to:
Meanwhile, the FDA?s official stance regarding trace amounts of dioxins is that there are ** expected health risks associated with trace amounts of dioxins in tampons?So wait a minute?according to our **ble guardians at the FDA, dioxin is okay, but by golly, they?ve got to monitor those women who use flannel and organic cotton!!!! They must keep those women safe ? and of course, dependent on a monthly trip to pay their dues at the altar of Proctor and Gamble, and companies like them. (Learn more from the World Health Organization about the dangers of the dioxin they say is okay to place in your private areas.) Sellers of these products have been **tified that they must scramble to come up with over $3600 by December 31 to remain in business. Prices of these products are sure to rise in order for the makers to be able to stay in business. Support them by checking out this set of 5 pads or going for the gusto and getting a supply of 20 pads  . You can also keep the FDA out of your panties by making your own Pads - here are simple instructions.If you agree that this is a ridiculous example of overreach that supports the interests of Big Business over the cottage industries that allow families to be independent and help to build a healthy eco**my, please sign this petition on the We the People website. Resources
If you enjoyed this article, please Vote for The Organic Prepper as a top prepping web site.  أكثر... ??????? ??????: FDA: Reusuable Menstrual Pads to be Subject to $4000 a Year in Extortion Fees || ??????: ahlam1399 || ??????: اسم منتداك
|
|
|
|
العرض العادي
