|
|
#1
01-10-2020, 06:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
CII terms some NAB Ordinance clauses un-Islamic
Talking to the media after Council's meeting, the CII Chairman, Dr Qibla Ayaz said the CII declared that clauses 14-D, 15-A and 26 were un-Islamic and against the Sharia. He maintained that concept of accountability as given under the NAB Ordinance was not in conformity with Islam norms for justice. He pointed out that as per Constitution, no law which clashes with Islam could prevail in the country. He said that there was no concept of plea bargain in Islam while keeping an accusedin detention for a long time without registration of a case and hand-cuffing was un-Islamic. The CII chairman also said making an accused approver was also un-Islamic. The CII chairman said that Islam also did not permit publicity of an accused on media. To a question about some remarks given in detailed judgment in high treason case against Pervez Musharraf, he said the meeting was not called for that purpose. "The remarks like body of Pervez Musharraf are not part of judgment but personal opinion of the judge," he said. He told newsmen that the Council prepares comprehensive recommendations on burning issue of child abuse. The religious scholars also recommended the legislation of strict laws and establishment of separate courts to prevent child abuse in the country.The CII has also decided to invite minority leaders at next meeting on issue of forced conversion, saying that there is no such provision in the religion. The CII meeting also suggested Ministry of Interior to introduce a performa for those minority members who want to accept Islam. The same performa should be presented in the court. أكثر... ??????? ??????: CII terms some NAB Ordinance clauses un-Islamic || ??????: ahlam1399 || ??????: اسم منتداك
|
 |
|
|
العرض العادي
