ahlam1399
04-18-2017, 09:52 AM
ISLAMABAD: A former sportswoman and Director General Awareness and Prevention Cell National Accountability Bureau (NAB) Aliya Rashid has challenged the verdict of the Supreme Court of March 29, 2017, removing three military officials and a civilian who were inducted into the Bureau with inherent disqualification.
Aliya Rashid, who was ******* by the apex court, filed a review petition in the Supreme Court through her counsel Hafiz S A Rehman under Article 188 of the Constitution read with Order XXVI of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980.
Last month on March 29, 2017, a three-member bench of the apex court headed by Justice Ameer Hani Muslim, issued a verdict in a suo moto case regarding alleged illegalities, contraventions and violations in appointments in the anti-graft body. The court had directed removal of DG NAB, Lahore Major (R) Burhan Ali, DG NAB Karachi Major (R) Shabbir Ahmed and DG NAB, Balochistan Major (R) Tariq Mehmood Dawar and Aliya Rashid a sportswoman and DG NAB, Awareness and Prevention.
“Those ******rs, who did **t qualify for the initial appointment, need to be de-**tified immediately however, they are entitled to pensionary benefits and perks”, the court had ruled in its order after hearing all the parties in the matter.
The court had further ruled that these officials can apply for the posts against the advertisement but they will be reconsidered for the posts on merits and in accordance with law and as per required qualification.
These four ******rs had refused to opt for premature retirement and opted for contesting the case. Chairman NAB Qamar Zaman Chaudhry had informed the court that the three military officials inducted into the Bureau including DG NAB, Lahore Major (R) Burhan Ali, DG NAB Karachi Major (R) Shabbir Ahmed and DG NAB, Balochistan Major (R) Tariq Mehmood Dawar had refused to get premature retirement and opted to contest the case.
Aliya’s counsel Hafiz S A Rehman had told the court that she was appointed by former Prime Minister Mir Zafrullah Khan Jamali in recognition of his services in the international sports. The court, however, had observed that she could be appointed as DG Sports, secretary Sports or elsewhere but **t in NAB which deals with investigations.
The court had directed chairman NAB to de-**tify these officials adding that appointments to the **w-vacant posts can be made through the Federal Public Service Commission.
In her review petition, Aliya Rashid prayed that the impugned judgment may graciously be reviewed and recalled to the extent of the petitioner in view of the judgments earlier passed by the Supreme Court in CP ** 1632/2011 decided on December 2, 2011 and HRC ** 1305-G/2009 decided on September 16, 2009 accordingly.
It was recalled to the court that the Supreme Court in its judgment of October 16, 2009 had directed the chairman NAB to treat her equally as she was denied promotion to BPS-20 by the NAB authorities due to influential pressure of certain persons. The court had directed that the same treatment be given to her by exempting her from the NIPA Course and her case shall be dealt with for promotion from BPS-19 to BPS-20.
Similarly, the petitioner also referred to a**ther judgment, delivered by the Supreme Court against the Peshawar High Court wherein the Supreme Court held that she was appointed in BPS 19 in the NAB on the recommendation of the prime minister and subsequently promoted to BPS-20 as Director.
The apex court had held that there was **thing on record to indicate that anyone had challenged her initial appointments or her promotion, she contended adding that the court had also held that the observations in the impugned judgment shall **t affect the petitioner’s appointment, future promotion or career in any manner.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/com/cwEr/~4/qL41U5CkQJI
أكثر... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/com/cwEr/~3/qL41U5CkQJI/199319-NAB-ex-DG-files-review-petition-in-SC-against-her-removal)
Aliya Rashid, who was ******* by the apex court, filed a review petition in the Supreme Court through her counsel Hafiz S A Rehman under Article 188 of the Constitution read with Order XXVI of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980.
Last month on March 29, 2017, a three-member bench of the apex court headed by Justice Ameer Hani Muslim, issued a verdict in a suo moto case regarding alleged illegalities, contraventions and violations in appointments in the anti-graft body. The court had directed removal of DG NAB, Lahore Major (R) Burhan Ali, DG NAB Karachi Major (R) Shabbir Ahmed and DG NAB, Balochistan Major (R) Tariq Mehmood Dawar and Aliya Rashid a sportswoman and DG NAB, Awareness and Prevention.
“Those ******rs, who did **t qualify for the initial appointment, need to be de-**tified immediately however, they are entitled to pensionary benefits and perks”, the court had ruled in its order after hearing all the parties in the matter.
The court had further ruled that these officials can apply for the posts against the advertisement but they will be reconsidered for the posts on merits and in accordance with law and as per required qualification.
These four ******rs had refused to opt for premature retirement and opted for contesting the case. Chairman NAB Qamar Zaman Chaudhry had informed the court that the three military officials inducted into the Bureau including DG NAB, Lahore Major (R) Burhan Ali, DG NAB Karachi Major (R) Shabbir Ahmed and DG NAB, Balochistan Major (R) Tariq Mehmood Dawar had refused to get premature retirement and opted to contest the case.
Aliya’s counsel Hafiz S A Rehman had told the court that she was appointed by former Prime Minister Mir Zafrullah Khan Jamali in recognition of his services in the international sports. The court, however, had observed that she could be appointed as DG Sports, secretary Sports or elsewhere but **t in NAB which deals with investigations.
The court had directed chairman NAB to de-**tify these officials adding that appointments to the **w-vacant posts can be made through the Federal Public Service Commission.
In her review petition, Aliya Rashid prayed that the impugned judgment may graciously be reviewed and recalled to the extent of the petitioner in view of the judgments earlier passed by the Supreme Court in CP ** 1632/2011 decided on December 2, 2011 and HRC ** 1305-G/2009 decided on September 16, 2009 accordingly.
It was recalled to the court that the Supreme Court in its judgment of October 16, 2009 had directed the chairman NAB to treat her equally as she was denied promotion to BPS-20 by the NAB authorities due to influential pressure of certain persons. The court had directed that the same treatment be given to her by exempting her from the NIPA Course and her case shall be dealt with for promotion from BPS-19 to BPS-20.
Similarly, the petitioner also referred to a**ther judgment, delivered by the Supreme Court against the Peshawar High Court wherein the Supreme Court held that she was appointed in BPS 19 in the NAB on the recommendation of the prime minister and subsequently promoted to BPS-20 as Director.
The apex court had held that there was **thing on record to indicate that anyone had challenged her initial appointments or her promotion, she contended adding that the court had also held that the observations in the impugned judgment shall **t affect the petitioner’s appointment, future promotion or career in any manner.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/com/cwEr/~4/qL41U5CkQJI
أكثر... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/com/cwEr/~3/qL41U5CkQJI/199319-NAB-ex-DG-files-review-petition-in-SC-against-her-removal)