rss
01-14-2017, 05:02 AM
Court reopens patent case between Apple and Samsung
http://i.amz.mshcdn.com/8BEe2Bf9ORdMHxoBMfskSXGO_QA=/575x323/filters:quality(90)/https%3A%2F%2Fblueprint-api-production.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Fcard%2Fima ge%2F348435%2Ffc2fe86b-952b-4970-ad89-092d91bfd372.jpghttp://a.amz.mshcdn.com/assets/feed-tw-f7c0a094d16b7ee7c91a1e50839a8e00.jpg (http://twitter.com/share?via=Mashable&text=Court+reopens+patent+case+between+Apple+and+S amsung&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmashable.com%2F2017%2F01%2F13%2Fa pple-vs-samsung-patent-case%2F%3Futm_campaign%3DMash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial%26utm_cid%3DMash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial)http://a.amz.mshcdn.com/assets/feed-fb-c0a21e8841794479b8086c32c6f24ba1.jpg (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmashable.com%2F2017%2F01 %2F13%2Fapple-vs-samsung-patent-case%2F%3Futm_campaign%3DMash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial%26utm_cid%3DMash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&src=sp)
Samsung's long battle with Apple has entered a pivotal new phase.
A patent case between the two tech rivals was reopened late Thursday evening, Law 360 reports (https://www.law360.com/articles/880239/fed-circ-reopens-apple-samsung-patent-damages-row). The major outstanding question (http://www.macrumors.com/2017/01/13/apple-vs-samsung-reopened/) is how much Samsung will have to pay Apple for infringing on the iPhone's design.*
SEE ALSO: Apple might depend on a rival for the next iPhone's display (http://mashable.com/2016/12/29/2017-iphone-samsung-display-panels/)
This case has a long and complicated history stretching back to 2011. You could spend hours exploring this rabbit hole, but the most relevant bit to Thursday's news came last month (http://mashable.com/2016/12/06/samsung-supreme-court-apple/), when the Supreme Court reversed a ruling that would have forced Samsung to pay Apple $399 million for copying aspects of the iPhone's design. Read more... (http://mashable.com/2017/01/13/apple-vs-samsung-patent-case/?utm_campaign=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial)
More about Apple V. Samsung (http://mashable.com/category/apple-v.-samsung/?utm_campaign=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial), Samsung (http://mashable.com/category/samsung/?utm_campaign=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial), Apple (http://mashable.com/category/apple/?utm_campaign=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial), and Tech (http://mashable.com/tech/?utm_campaign=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial)http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ad?iu=/6692/mash.to/rss&pos=atf&tag=ad&mtype=standard&type=rss&sz=300x250&c=1484350772 (http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?iu=/6692/mash.to/rss&pos=atf&tag=ad&mtype=standard&type=rss&sz=300x250&c=1484350772)
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mashable/~4/GWsLJtu0Gck
http://i.amz.mshcdn.com/8BEe2Bf9ORdMHxoBMfskSXGO_QA=/575x323/filters:quality(90)/https%3A%2F%2Fblueprint-api-production.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Fcard%2Fima ge%2F348435%2Ffc2fe86b-952b-4970-ad89-092d91bfd372.jpghttp://a.amz.mshcdn.com/assets/feed-tw-f7c0a094d16b7ee7c91a1e50839a8e00.jpg (http://twitter.com/share?via=Mashable&text=Court+reopens+patent+case+between+Apple+and+S amsung&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmashable.com%2F2017%2F01%2F13%2Fa pple-vs-samsung-patent-case%2F%3Futm_campaign%3DMash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial%26utm_cid%3DMash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial)http://a.amz.mshcdn.com/assets/feed-fb-c0a21e8841794479b8086c32c6f24ba1.jpg (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmashable.com%2F2017%2F01 %2F13%2Fapple-vs-samsung-patent-case%2F%3Futm_campaign%3DMash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial%26utm_cid%3DMash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&src=sp)
Samsung's long battle with Apple has entered a pivotal new phase.
A patent case between the two tech rivals was reopened late Thursday evening, Law 360 reports (https://www.law360.com/articles/880239/fed-circ-reopens-apple-samsung-patent-damages-row). The major outstanding question (http://www.macrumors.com/2017/01/13/apple-vs-samsung-reopened/) is how much Samsung will have to pay Apple for infringing on the iPhone's design.*
SEE ALSO: Apple might depend on a rival for the next iPhone's display (http://mashable.com/2016/12/29/2017-iphone-samsung-display-panels/)
This case has a long and complicated history stretching back to 2011. You could spend hours exploring this rabbit hole, but the most relevant bit to Thursday's news came last month (http://mashable.com/2016/12/06/samsung-supreme-court-apple/), when the Supreme Court reversed a ruling that would have forced Samsung to pay Apple $399 million for copying aspects of the iPhone's design. Read more... (http://mashable.com/2017/01/13/apple-vs-samsung-patent-case/?utm_campaign=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial)
More about Apple V. Samsung (http://mashable.com/category/apple-v.-samsung/?utm_campaign=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial), Samsung (http://mashable.com/category/samsung/?utm_campaign=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial), Apple (http://mashable.com/category/apple/?utm_campaign=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial), and Tech (http://mashable.com/tech/?utm_campaign=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial)http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ad?iu=/6692/mash.to/rss&pos=atf&tag=ad&mtype=standard&type=rss&sz=300x250&c=1484350772 (http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?iu=/6692/mash.to/rss&pos=atf&tag=ad&mtype=standard&type=rss&sz=300x250&c=1484350772)
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mashable/~4/GWsLJtu0Gck