ahlam1399
06-22-2016, 02:50 PM
Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed questions if Ayyan Ali is a terrorist; says court k**ws how to get its orders implemented; why should interior secretary **t be jailed?
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) on Tuesday admitted for regular hearing an appeal filed by the Federation against the Sindh High Court (SHC) ruling, asking the Federal Interior Ministry to remove model Ayyan Ali’s name from the Exit Control List (ECL).
A two-member bench of the apex court headed by Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed heard the appeal filed by Interior Secretary Arif Ahmed Khan and Aurangzeb Haq, Additional Secretary of the Exit Control List (ECL), against the verdict of the SHC.
The court issued a **tice to Attorney General for Pakistan. During the course of hearing, Justice Azmat Saeed Sheikh questioned, “Is Ayyan Ali a terrorist? Additional Attorney General Waqar Ali Rana informed the court Ayyan Ali’s name was placed on the ECL in response to Home Department Punjab because she was **minated in an FIR launched in Customs Inspector Chuahdry Ejaz Mahmood’s murder case and needed to be investigated.
At this, Justice Azmat Saeed Sheikh remarked as to whether the name of every suspect of a murder case in Punjab ends up on the ECL. He further questioned as to whether the government has put names of all the persons that have been sent **tices by the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) for tax payment on the ECL?
“Everybody k**ws what is happening. The court k**ws how to get its orders implemented,” Justice Azmat Saeed observed adding as to why the federal interior secretary should **t be sent behind bars.
Addressing the law ******r, Justice Azmat Saeed said that the court will **t cease its function if its orders are **t being implemented, adding that the matter in hand is of sensitive nature so the concerned should take tangible measures in this regard.
Sardar Latif Khosa, counsel for Ayyan Ali, contended that former army chief and President Pervez Musharraf was allowed to travel abroad without any interference because he was influential.
It is pertinent to mention here that a division bench of the SHC on June 2, 2016 ruled that its order about Ayyan Ali would take effect on June 9 saying until then the federation can move against the verdict before the apex court. On June 9, Interior Secretary Arif Ahmed Khan and Aurangzeb Haq, Additional Secretary of the Exit Control List (ECL) filed a criminal appeal under Article 19 (1) (ii) of the Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003 against the verdict of SHC.
On Monday, June 20, Ayyan Ali while filing her reply in the matter through her counsel Sardar Latif Khosa contended that the court had granted her permission to go abroad but the court’s order was **t yet implemented in letter and spirit.
She said the immigration staff at the Karachi International Airport stopped her from going abroad. She said the immigration staff told her that they will **t abide by the court’s orders. She further said that she was **t shown any order or letter of the concerned authorities that prevents her from going abroad.
She complained that whenever her name was ******* from the ECL, the Interior Ministry again put her name on the ECL after a few hours. She contended that the Interior Ministry was bent upon creating hurdles in her visit abroad.
In its appeal, the Interior Ministry stated that the high court’s order was **t sustainable under the law. The ministry also expressed apprehension that uploading of list of persons on ECL on its website may create social and cultural problems for persons on the ECL as society would show hate towards such persons.
The federal government also contended that the high court could **t issue directions suo motu for placing information on the website and other directions particularly when ** prayer was made to that effect.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/com/YEor/~4/cHmSrFrXT4o
أكثر... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/com/YEor/~3/cHmSrFrXT4o/129809-Is-every-murder-suspect-in-Punjab-put-on-ECL-SC-asks-govt)
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) on Tuesday admitted for regular hearing an appeal filed by the Federation against the Sindh High Court (SHC) ruling, asking the Federal Interior Ministry to remove model Ayyan Ali’s name from the Exit Control List (ECL).
A two-member bench of the apex court headed by Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed heard the appeal filed by Interior Secretary Arif Ahmed Khan and Aurangzeb Haq, Additional Secretary of the Exit Control List (ECL), against the verdict of the SHC.
The court issued a **tice to Attorney General for Pakistan. During the course of hearing, Justice Azmat Saeed Sheikh questioned, “Is Ayyan Ali a terrorist? Additional Attorney General Waqar Ali Rana informed the court Ayyan Ali’s name was placed on the ECL in response to Home Department Punjab because she was **minated in an FIR launched in Customs Inspector Chuahdry Ejaz Mahmood’s murder case and needed to be investigated.
At this, Justice Azmat Saeed Sheikh remarked as to whether the name of every suspect of a murder case in Punjab ends up on the ECL. He further questioned as to whether the government has put names of all the persons that have been sent **tices by the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) for tax payment on the ECL?
“Everybody k**ws what is happening. The court k**ws how to get its orders implemented,” Justice Azmat Saeed observed adding as to why the federal interior secretary should **t be sent behind bars.
Addressing the law ******r, Justice Azmat Saeed said that the court will **t cease its function if its orders are **t being implemented, adding that the matter in hand is of sensitive nature so the concerned should take tangible measures in this regard.
Sardar Latif Khosa, counsel for Ayyan Ali, contended that former army chief and President Pervez Musharraf was allowed to travel abroad without any interference because he was influential.
It is pertinent to mention here that a division bench of the SHC on June 2, 2016 ruled that its order about Ayyan Ali would take effect on June 9 saying until then the federation can move against the verdict before the apex court. On June 9, Interior Secretary Arif Ahmed Khan and Aurangzeb Haq, Additional Secretary of the Exit Control List (ECL) filed a criminal appeal under Article 19 (1) (ii) of the Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003 against the verdict of SHC.
On Monday, June 20, Ayyan Ali while filing her reply in the matter through her counsel Sardar Latif Khosa contended that the court had granted her permission to go abroad but the court’s order was **t yet implemented in letter and spirit.
She said the immigration staff at the Karachi International Airport stopped her from going abroad. She said the immigration staff told her that they will **t abide by the court’s orders. She further said that she was **t shown any order or letter of the concerned authorities that prevents her from going abroad.
She complained that whenever her name was ******* from the ECL, the Interior Ministry again put her name on the ECL after a few hours. She contended that the Interior Ministry was bent upon creating hurdles in her visit abroad.
In its appeal, the Interior Ministry stated that the high court’s order was **t sustainable under the law. The ministry also expressed apprehension that uploading of list of persons on ECL on its website may create social and cultural problems for persons on the ECL as society would show hate towards such persons.
The federal government also contended that the high court could **t issue directions suo motu for placing information on the website and other directions particularly when ** prayer was made to that effect.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/com/YEor/~4/cHmSrFrXT4o
أكثر... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/com/YEor/~3/cHmSrFrXT4o/129809-Is-every-murder-suspect-in-Punjab-put-on-ECL-SC-asks-govt)