rss
03-22-2016, 02:27 AM
U.S. Supreme Court rejects challenge to Colorado's marijuana laws
http://rack.1.mshcdn.com/media/ZgkyMDE2LzAzLzIxL2NkL2NvbG9yYWRvZmxhLjE1YjA5LmpwZw pwCXRodW1iCTU3NXgzMjMjCmUJanBn/bc327e4b/29c/colorado-flag.jpghttp://rack.1.mshcdn.com/assets/feed-tw-f7c0a094d16b7ee7c91a1e50839a8e00.jpg (http://twitter.com/share?via=Mashable&text=U.S.+Supreme+Court+rejects+challenge+to+Color ado%27s+marijuana+laws&src=http%3A%2F%2Fmashable.com%2F2016%2F03%2F21%2Fs upreme-court-colorado-marijuana-case%2F)http://rack.1.mshcdn.com/assets/feed-fb-c0a21e8841794479b8086c32c6f24ba1.jpg (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmashable.com%2F2016%2F03 %2F21%2Fsupreme-court-colorado-marijuana-case%2F&src=sp)
While marijuana advocates across the United States have been in a nail-biting frenzy ever since it was revealed that a lawsuit filed in the U.S. Supreme Court had the potential of shutting down the cannabis industry (http://bit.ly/1RoEI6A), the nation’s highest court an**unced on Monday it would dismiss a case submitted by Oklahoma and Nebraska suggesting that Colorado’s retail pot market had become a drug trafficking menace.
In the case of Nebraska and Oklahoma v. Colorado, the plaintiffs argued that Amendment 64, which ended pot prohibition in the Centennial State, was a flagrant violation of the Controlled Substances Act and the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The lawsuit claimed the two states were “suffering a direct and significant detrimental impact,” as a result of the Colorado cannabis trade, and it begged the U.S. Supreme Court to force its indefinite closure. Read more... (http://mashable.com/2016/03/21/supreme-court-colorado-marijuana-case/)
More about Supreme Court (http://mashable.com/category/supreme-court/?utm_campaign=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial), Colorado (http://mashable.com/category/colorado/?utm_campaign=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial), Weed (http://mashable.com/category/weed/?utm_campaign=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial), Marijuana (http://mashable.com/category/marijuana/?utm_campaign=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial), and Cannabis (http://mashable.com/category/cannabis/?utm_campaign=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial)http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/mash.to/rss;pos=atf;tag=ad;mtype=standard;type=rss;sz=300x 250;ord=1458597143 (http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/mash.to/rss;pos=atf;tag=ad;mtype=standard;type=rss;sz=300x 250;ord=1458597143)http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mashable/~4/7s8foA9UsCI
http://rack.1.mshcdn.com/media/ZgkyMDE2LzAzLzIxL2NkL2NvbG9yYWRvZmxhLjE1YjA5LmpwZw pwCXRodW1iCTU3NXgzMjMjCmUJanBn/bc327e4b/29c/colorado-flag.jpghttp://rack.1.mshcdn.com/assets/feed-tw-f7c0a094d16b7ee7c91a1e50839a8e00.jpg (http://twitter.com/share?via=Mashable&text=U.S.+Supreme+Court+rejects+challenge+to+Color ado%27s+marijuana+laws&src=http%3A%2F%2Fmashable.com%2F2016%2F03%2F21%2Fs upreme-court-colorado-marijuana-case%2F)http://rack.1.mshcdn.com/assets/feed-fb-c0a21e8841794479b8086c32c6f24ba1.jpg (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmashable.com%2F2016%2F03 %2F21%2Fsupreme-court-colorado-marijuana-case%2F&src=sp)
While marijuana advocates across the United States have been in a nail-biting frenzy ever since it was revealed that a lawsuit filed in the U.S. Supreme Court had the potential of shutting down the cannabis industry (http://bit.ly/1RoEI6A), the nation’s highest court an**unced on Monday it would dismiss a case submitted by Oklahoma and Nebraska suggesting that Colorado’s retail pot market had become a drug trafficking menace.
In the case of Nebraska and Oklahoma v. Colorado, the plaintiffs argued that Amendment 64, which ended pot prohibition in the Centennial State, was a flagrant violation of the Controlled Substances Act and the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The lawsuit claimed the two states were “suffering a direct and significant detrimental impact,” as a result of the Colorado cannabis trade, and it begged the U.S. Supreme Court to force its indefinite closure. Read more... (http://mashable.com/2016/03/21/supreme-court-colorado-marijuana-case/)
More about Supreme Court (http://mashable.com/category/supreme-court/?utm_campaign=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial), Colorado (http://mashable.com/category/colorado/?utm_campaign=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial), Weed (http://mashable.com/category/weed/?utm_campaign=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial), Marijuana (http://mashable.com/category/marijuana/?utm_campaign=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial), and Cannabis (http://mashable.com/category/cannabis/?utm_campaign=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial)http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/mash.to/rss;pos=atf;tag=ad;mtype=standard;type=rss;sz=300x 250;ord=1458597143 (http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/mash.to/rss;pos=atf;tag=ad;mtype=standard;type=rss;sz=300x 250;ord=1458597143)http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mashable/~4/7s8foA9UsCI