The dating app Tinder has faced increasing scrutiny over abusive interactions on the service. In November 2019, an Auckland man was convicted of murdering British woman Grace Millane after they met on Tinder. Incidents such as these have brought attention to the potential for serious violence facilitated by dating apps.<\/p>\n
Amid ongoing pressure to better protect its users, Tinder recently unveiled some new safety features.<\/p>\n
The US version of the app added a panic button that alerts law enforcement to provide emergency assistance, in partnership with the safety app Noonlight. There is also a photo verification feature that will allow users to verify images they upload to their profiles, in an effort to prevent catfishing.<\/p>\n
\u201cDoes This Bother You?\u201d is another new feature, which automatically detects offensive messages in the app\u2019s instant messaging service, and asks the user whether they\u2019d like to report it. Finally, a Safety Center will give users a more visible space to see resources and tools that can keep them safe on the app.<\/p>\n
These features are an improvement, but they won\u2019t end the harassment of women via the platform.<\/p>\n
Previously unsafe<\/h2>\n
My Ph.D. research investigated experiences that make women feel unsafe on Tinder. It showed the app\u2019s previous attempts to curb harassment have been inadequate.<\/p>\n
Read: [Tinder and Bumble under investigation over underage use, sex offenders, and data handling]<\/em><\/p>\n In 2017, Tinder launched a feature to allow users to send animated messages, called \u201cReactions,\u201d in reply to unacceptable messages they received. The negative images, which only women could send, included an eye roll and throwing a drink in someone\u2019s face. Tinder claimed Reactions would give users a fun and easy way to \u201ccall out\u201d the \u201cdouchey\u201d behavior of men.<\/p>\n The main critique of Reactions is that it puts the onus on women, rather than the app itself, to police the abusive behavior of men. The effect was to distance Tinder from its users\u2019 behavior, rather than engage meaningfully with it.<\/p>\n Tinder\u2019s latest safety mechanisms are an improvement. The newly released tools suggest Tinder is taking the harassment of women more seriously, and a button that alerts law enforcement might actually protect users from physical abuse.<\/p>\n But the panic button is only available in the United States. Given the service operates in more than 190 countries, Tinder should consider rolling it out worldwide.<\/p>\n The new \u201cDoes This Bother You?\u201d feature could also prove useful in preventing overt harassment. Using machine learning, it will prompt users to report inappropriate messages they receive through the service. Research and a range of social media pages show that harassing and abusive messages are commonly facilitated through the platform\u2019s instant messaging service.<\/p>\n Because a great deal of harassment and abusive behavior is normalized, it is unclear how much Tinder\u2019s new measures will protect women. My research showed that many women using Tinder experienced behavior that made them feel uncomfortable, but they didn\u2019t think it met the threshold of abuse.<\/p>\n Sometimes, abusive behaviors can be initially interpreted as romantic or caring. One woman I interviewed reported receiving an overwhelming number of lengthy text messages and phone calls from a Tinder user who was pressuring her into having dinner with him. At first, the woman considered the man\u2019s behaviour \u201csweet,\u201d viewing it as an indication that he really liked her. But after the number of his messages became torrential, she feared for her safety.<\/p>\n For experiences like this, Tinder\u2019s \u201cDoes This Bother You?\u201d feature would be ineffective since the messages were sent via SMS. The limitations of the in-app messaging feature, such as the inability to send photographs, led many of the women I interviewed to talk to prospective dates through other digital media. But Tinder cannot identify communication on other services. The inability to send photos, however, does prevent users from receiving unsolicited images within the app.<\/p>\n Even if the man\u2019s messages were sent in-app, it is unclear whether the \u201cDoes This Bother You\u201d algorithm would prompt users to report messages that are seemingly romantic in content.<\/p>\n For the \u201cDoes This Bother You?\u201d feature to be effective, Tinder needs to be better at responding to users\u2019 reports. Some of the women I interviewed stopped reporting other users\u2019 bad behavior, because of Tinder\u2019s failure to act.<\/p>\n One woman described reporting a man who had sent her harassing messages, only to see his profile on the service days later. This points to a big problem: Tinder does little to enforce its Terms of Use, which reserves the right to delete accounts that engage in harassment.<\/p>\n Tinder\u2019s failure to respond to user reports sends a messages that they\u2019re not justified, leaving users with the impression that harassment is tolerated. The app\u2019s new safety features will only help users if Tinder does better to address user reports.<\/p>\n While Tinder\u2019s new safety mechanisms are an improvement, the platform will need to do more to address normalized abuse. It can begin to do this by listening to women about what makes them feel uneasy, uncomfortable, and unsafe on the app. This article is republished from The Conversation\u00a0by\u00a0Rosalie Gillett, Research Associate in Digital Platform Regulation, Queensland University of Technology\u00a0under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.<\/em><\/p>\n \n Read next:<\/b>![\"\"](\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/314117\/original\/file-20200207-43102-figpkx.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=754&fit=clip\")
A swipe in the right direction<\/h2>\n
\u2018De-normalizing\u2019 abuse<\/h2>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/314376\/original\/file-20200210-52384-rg65mg.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=754&fit=clip\")
Taking users seriously<\/h2>\n
![\"The](\"https:\/\/counter.theconversation.com\/content\/131375\/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic\")
<\/p>\n
\n
\n Nope, I refuse to believe this leaked Pixel 5 prototype is real <\/a>\n<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n