{"id":197858,"date":"2020-02-05T04:31:37","date_gmt":"2020-02-05T01:31:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ww-vb.mine.nu\/w108\/study-claims-iphone-11-pro-radiation-level-is-twice-the-federal-safety-limit-bgr\/"},"modified":"2020-02-05T04:31:37","modified_gmt":"2020-02-05T01:31:37","slug":"study-claims-iphone-11-pro-radiation-level-is-twice-the-federal-safety-limit-bgr","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hameed.nwar.uk\/sa\/study-claims-iphone-11-pro-radiation-level-is-twice-the-federal-safety-limit-bgr\/","title":{"rendered":"Study claims iPhone 11 Pro radiation level is twice the federal safety limit \u2013 BGR"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> [ad_1]<br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>A new study commissioned by Penumbra Brands finds that radiation emanating from the iPhone 11 Pro is at a level thought to be dangerous to consumers. Specifically, results tabulated by RF Exposure Lab reveal that radiation from the iPhone 11 Pro is more than twice the FCC\u2019s existing safety limit.<\/p>\n<p>The tests were performed with an iPhone 11 Pro located approximately 5mm away from a mannequin, with RF Exposure Lab noting that the radiation exposure could be even more pronounced if a phone is located in a user\u2019s pocket.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cCellphone users should be concerned about exposure to RF radiation,\u201d Penumbra Brands CTO Ryan McCaughey said in a press release. \u201cThe testing shows the iPhone 11 Pro potentially exposes people to more than double what the FCC has deemed safe.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>So should you be worried? Well, you might want to take this report with a whopping grain of salt.<\/p>\n<p>For starters, look at the chart below.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" data-attachment-id=\"5787856\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/bgr.com\/2020\/02\/04\/iphone-11-pro-radiation-level-case-dangerous-high-fcc\/iphone-radiation\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/boygeniusreport.files.wordpress.com\/2020\/02\/iphone-radiation.png\" data-orig-size=\"888,502\" data-comments-opened=\"0\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"iphone-radiation\" data-image-description=\"\" data-medium-file=\"https:\/\/boygeniusreport.files.wordpress.com\/2020\/02\/iphone-radiation.png?w=300\" data-large-file=\"http:\/\/ww-vb.mine.nu\/w108\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/Study-claims-iPhone-11-Pro-radiation-level-is-twice-the.png\" class=\"size-full wp-image-5787856 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/ww-vb.mine.nu\/w108\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/Study-claims-iPhone-11-Pro-radiation-level-is-twice-the.png\" alt=\"\"  \/><\/p>\n<p>It seems a bit jarring at first glance, to be sure. However, you\u2019ll notice that a standalone iPhone 11 Pro is being measured against iPhones housed in Gadget Guard cases with alara technology. And guess who sells these cases? Why Penumbra Brands, of course.<\/p>\n<p>The company\u2019s website reads in part:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Alara-enabled cases are embedded with proprietary technology which automatically couples with the mobile devices internal antennas, redirecting radiation away from the user, thereby reducing exposure to cell phone radiation without degrading the phone\u2019s signal. Results from tests in FCC-certified labs show that alara technology\u2026 reduces exposure by up to 67% versus an unprotected device.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Essentially, the company warning against iPhone 11 Pro radiation just so happens to be the same company willing you to sell you an iPhone case to protect yourself from said radiation. How convenient.<\/p>\n<p>If any of this sounds familiar, you might recall that the <em>Chicago Tribune<\/em> last year commissioned a similar study and found that Apple\u2019s iPhone 7 put out radiation at a level that was far in excess of the federal limit. The story naturally gained a lot of traction and prompted Apple to provide the FCC with a few iPhone models for further testing.<\/p>\n<p>When the dust settled, the FCC found that the iPhone X, iPhone 8, and iPhone 7 put out radiation that was far below the federal limit for radiofrequency radiation.<\/p>\n<p>The FCC\u2019s full report can be found over here.<\/p>\n<p>Penumbra Brands challenges the FCC report to the extent that its own testing used off-the-shelf iPhone models whereas the FCC\u2019s testing used iPhones supplied by Apple. It seems beyond the realm of comprehension, however, that Apple would slyly provide the FCC with some sort of tweaked iPhone model in an effort to skew the test results. And yet, that seems to be what Penumbra Brands is implying.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn the recent FCC tests, the iPhone XS model that wasn\u2019t supplied by Apple reveals the testing flaws\u2014radiation is 28 times higher than the agency\u2019s original report,\u201d McCaughey said. \u201cThat discrepancy should have been cause for alarm at the FCC, but they didn\u2019t even comment on it. Consumers should develop cellphone use habits to protect themselves from over exposure.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>At this point, the only cause for alarm is coming from a company willing to sell you a solution for a problem the FCC claims doesn\u2019t exist.<\/p>\n<p>You can do with that information what you will, but it seems like a safe bet that excessive radiation from the iPhone 11 Pro is not something worth worrying about.<\/p>\n<p>\n\t<span class=\"description img-caption\"><span class=\"source\">Image Source: Zach Epstein, BGR<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"author-bio\">\n<div class=\"author-bio-image-container with-avatar\">\n\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/ww-vb.mine.nu\/w108\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/All-the-unexpected-products-Apple-is-set-to-release-in.jpg\" height=\"52px\" width=\"47px\"\/><\/div>\n<p>\n\t\tA life long Mac user and Apple enthusiast, Yoni Heisler has been writing about Apple and the tech industry at large for over 6 years. His writing has appeared in Edible Apple, Network World, MacLife, Macworld UK, and most recently, TUAW. When not writing about and analyzing the latest happenings with Apple, Yoni enjoys catching Improv shows in Chicago, playing soccer, and cultivating new TV show addictions, the most recent examples being The Walking Dead and Broad City.\t<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<p><script>\n!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)\n{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?\nn.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};\nif(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';\nn.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;\nt.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];\ns.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window,document,'script',\n'https:\/\/connect.facebook.net\/en_US\/fbevents.js');\nfbq('init', '2048158068807929');\nfbq('track', 'ViewContent');\n<\/script><br \/>\n<br \/>[ad_2]<br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/bgr.com\/2020\/02\/04\/iphone-11-pro-radiation-level-case-dangerous-high-fcc\/\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[ad_1] A new study commissioned by Penumbra Brands finds that radiation emanating from the iPhone 11 Pro is at a level thought to be dangerous to consumers. Specifically, results tabulated by RF Exposure Lab reveal that radiation from the iPhone 11 Pro is more than twice the FCC\u2019s existing safety limit. The tests were performed &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":197285,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-197858","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-tie-tech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hameed.nwar.uk\/sa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197858","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hameed.nwar.uk\/sa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hameed.nwar.uk\/sa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hameed.nwar.uk\/sa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hameed.nwar.uk\/sa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=197858"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hameed.nwar.uk\/sa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197858\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hameed.nwar.uk\/sa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/197285"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hameed.nwar.uk\/sa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=197858"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hameed.nwar.uk\/sa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=197858"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hameed.nwar.uk\/sa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=197858"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}