I used to be WRONG in regards to the iPhone 11 Professional Digital camera…
Get an unrestricted 30-day free trial of FreshBooks at
Monitor and handle your PC in real-time with Pulseway! Create your free account right now at
Is Apple’s Deep Fusion know-how REALLY that huge of a distinction maker? We needed to seek out out for certain…
Purchase Google Pixel four on Amazon (PAID LINK):
Purchase iPhone 11 on Amazon (PAID LINK):
Purchase Samsung Observe10 on Amazon (PAID LINK):
Purchase Huawei Mate 30 Professional on Amazon (PAID LINK):
Purchases made by means of some retailer hyperlinks might present some compensation to Linus Media Group.
Talk about on the discussion board:
Our Associates, Referral Applications, and Sponsors:
Get a Displate Steel Print at
Get a 30-day free trial of Amazon Prime at
Linus Tech Ideas merchandise at
Our Check Benches on Amazon:
Our manufacturing gear:
Twitter –
Fb –
Instagram –
Twitch –
Intro Display Music Credit score:
Title: Laszlo – Supernova
Video Hyperlink:
iTunes Obtain Hyperlink:
Artist Hyperlink:
Outro Display Music Credit score: Approaching Nirvana – Sugar Excessive
supply
Am i the only one who thought the resturant image taken by pixel 4 looks best of the bunch.
IMO Mate 30 Pro wins in basically every comparison…
Apple just do it better…
3:59 the Pixel 4 looks by far the best to me. The others look washed out and less true to life.
The fuck?Seeing a Linus add in a Linus video
4:00 Come on… The quality of the picture is way better for the pixel 4. Yeah, the window is blown out, but the focus is on the face and that is clearly the best. The iPhones picture is noisy as hell, the mate is completely overprocessed. Note 10 is fine, but still not as good as the pixels. (Note, that you have different shadows, which makes it harder for the pixel, as it is not as evenly lit)
Technically they copyed Google GCam functions but worst
Honestly I think they all look like fairly good shots across the board. I love mobile photography and I wouldn't be upset with any of the images and I'd likely tinker a little with all of them anyway. My goto is pretty much always the iPhone though, you're right it's consistently good, it's the gold standard for mobile photography for me and the video footage here was fantastic.
Damn who’s the girl thoe ??
did any one say that deep fusion work on night mode ? because it does not
Still Note Images are looking gooe
When you forgot the mate 30 pro existed as Huawei knew it just wouldn't sell so never brought it to the county your in.
i dont do enough cool stuff to enjoy this camera hahaha. galaxy s10+ ftw! hahaha
I prefer Huawei any day
Finally you understand that
I own the 11pro and the pixel photos looked the best every time
Iphone 11 looks very yellow and very high on contrast. The motion video was fantastic on the iphone though. Note 10 I feel did the best in the stadium/bridge picture. But when you brake it down, I think Pixel 4 did the best in most categories, and it took what i felt were the most realistic photos without over exaggeration, though the iphone 11 did a great job in capturing detail in some of the pictures.
Deep fusion bullshit i have iphone 11
LTT, can you guys try water test, astrophotography test, drop test/shake test also some front camera testing aswell. Thank you
Photos – Pixel
Videos – iPhone
Who is that beautiful girl???
Aston Martins parked in Bentley parking lot=savage
Can we get some reviews of Dual Sim phones?
So Linus reads all the comments, like every single one of them?
Who else got the Linus ad?
Over reated cellphone cameras? I havent use a huawei since mate 10, actually I use an iphone but I still saw in this videos leica’s huawei are superior
Before watching and possible commenting on other things in this video: I think the cameras are overstated and too much energy is spent on them. They're good enough and have been for several generations. I'd be more than happy to spend less on the same phone with an older camera set-up or as much on the same set-up but with time/energy/ resources spent on stuff that actually matters (to me). On that note. How much of the overall cost of making the phone is taken up by the camera nowadays? A lazy search told me that it was 9.5% of the iPhone 7 ( https://petapixel.com/2016/10/22/iphone-7s-camera-parts-cost-26-9-5-phone ).
Nice
Umm iPhone deep fusion can be used in the “golden light” …Meaning it works only at certain times.
Huawei phones are so much better and the clarity is better.
None of these shallow Apple lemmings can tell the difference, the phone could take 480p pictures and they'd still argue it's better and pay 1500 for it.
honestly, I disagree, I'd rather have a gold every now and then and break my ankle rather than all silvers
Going through these comments I think that there's a fairly big missed point. Half of the people say you cant fix lighting. Half the people say you cant fix missing detail. Honestly if there's enough dedication involved from the editor you can fix anything. Here's my issue with this whole thing… I didn't see the majority use case. Most people I know use their phone cameras to capture moments in moments. Rarely does background detail matter, subject detail does. Lighting, shading, detail and accuracy are amazing words to throw around but ultimately don't matter for a camera that isn't pro-line. In the restaurant photo I care more about the reflection in the eyes, the natural light on the cheek, the soft shading of the lashes and the texture detail of her jacket, skin and hair than the reflections, trees and bloom of whats going on behind her. From a realistic perspective the given occasion of the pic determines how much editing I'm going to put into the photo. As this isn't a wedding photo… or a pro shoot, etc I guarantee that NOBODY is going to fix the obvious lighting, texture or detail issues of any of these photos.
10:58 I'm wet